nintendo and etc created by pixelyteskunk
Viewing sample resized to 49% of original (view original) Loading...
Description
FurAffinity source

FA's New Mascot Clyde

Hi kids, I'm Clyde!
the 13 year old boy who was transformed into a female eevee!
currently I am pregnant with a litter of six eggs.
One of my favorite interests is vore!
me and my friends eat each other for fun, come in!

Twitter source

The new mascot for @furaffinity

you guys can use the design no need to credit! yw

Show all comments
Blacklisted

    ....the new rule is pretty stupid.... i have a lot of pokemon sonas...some very basic with slight changes to their...model? like my sona is a Poochyena, with a scar on his eye lid, per the he's a cub unless i "age" him up.... sona is the canine equivalent of a 18+ canine twink...that has to work out and gain experience to evolve... but refused to become he loves the attention he gets as a "pup"

    as for other sonas they look very different as they are hybrids but the similar deal, they are twinks (easiest explanation, since they are 18+ but have the "pup" body) i do have a couple that do not wish to evolve and keep their "base form" you know kinda liks ash's pikachu, so how would that work out?

    i mean considering that you know...it takes a "feral" being mature to you know engage in sexual acts you think it would be enough, but FA wants people to "age up" their characters?

    i mean i have no clue wth that means in the case of my sonas base form...or any of my other ocs.

    in the End it might just be easier to post art of fully evolved forms on FA , and 1st or 2st stages on IB... or just completely move to IB to avoid the headaches of having two platforms

    hell might even just start posting here to E6 and try to get the hang of the tagging system.

  • |
  • 7
  • carnivore4lyf said:
    It's still there. Guess someone decided this post wasn't obvious enough to to warrent the tag

    That doesn't make any sense. It's obviously in reference to the policy. "13 year old" gives it away since that was the cutoff.

  • |
  • 5
  • lance_armstrong said:
    That doesn't make any sense. It's obviously in reference to the policy. "13 year old" gives it away since that was the cutoff.

    There is even talk on the Twitter source referencing the rule, it is definitely poking fun at it.

  • |
  • 3
  • lance_armstrong said:
    That doesn't make any sense. It's obviously in reference to the policy. "13 year old" gives it away since that was the cutoff.

    Ya bring it up with bitwolfy then, they've locked the tag

  • |
  • 0
  • donovan_dmc said:
    The _policy_2.7 tag is only meant to be used on posts which explicitly call out the guidelines, not those which vaguely reference them. The tag has been correctly locked off, as per this definition.

    Gonna ask for a second opinion on this one (and the wiki page since that's been edited and locked as well), because doesn't TWYS only apply to the general category? The rules say "Tags in other categories are valid if the information they are conveying is objectively true, such as the artist's name or the image's aspect ratio."

    The artist straight up said that it's referencing the policy update, so I don't see why it's locked off the post.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • werideatdawn said:
    Gonna ask for a second opinion on this one (and the wiki page since that's been edited and locked as well), because doesn't TWYS only apply to the general category? The rules say "Tags in other categories are valid if the information they are conveying is objectively true, such as the artist's name or the image's aspect ratio."

    The artist straight up said that it's referencing the policy update, so I don't see why it's locked off the post.

    The definition change came from bitWolfy. I updated the wiki a bit to further clarify the examples statement.
    This change was an internal decision agreed upon by multiple staff. It wasn't done on a whim by a few staff .

    FYI, TWYS does not only apply to general tags - it applies to everything but lore & invalid tags
    it may not directly apply to some like artists or meta, but in a sense it does still apply.

    • artists - artist must have had something to do with the post, which is present within in the post
    • characters - there must be some non-conflicting evidence of the character in the post
    • species - yet again, must have some non-conflicting evidence in the post
    • copyright - there must be something related to/fitting the definition in the post, depending on what type of copyright

    Updated

  • |
  • -3
  • donovan_dmc said:
    The definition change came from bitWolfy. I updated the wiki a bit to further clarify the examples statement.
    This change was an internal decision agreed upon by multiple staff. It wasn't done on a whim by a few staff .

    FYI, TWYS does not only apply to general tags - it applies to everything but lore & invalid tags
    it may not directly apply to some like artists or meta, but in a sense it does still apply.

    • artists - artist must have had something to do with the post, which is present within in the post
    • characters - there must be some non-conflicting evidence of the character in the post
    • species - yet again, must have some non-conflicting evidence in the post
    • copyright - there must be something related to/fitting the definition in the post, depending on what type of copyright

    If that's the case for TWYS, then alright. The tag lock in particular is weird since, even under the new definition, the post kinda is making direct references to the policy in the dialogue?

    • The 13 year old boy being pregnant is referencing the 'minors younger than 13 may not be depicted as pregnant" part (before the update that FA posted a day after the artist drew this that banned even teenage pregnancy)
    • The character mentions vore as a favorite interest and eating each other for fun, which is explicitly allowed under the policy due to it being deemed SFW/non-sexualized.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • furryvorelover01 said:
    ....the new rule is pretty stupid.... i have a lot of pokemon sonas...some very basic with slight changes to their...model? like my sona is a Poochyena, with a scar on his eye lid, per the he's a cub unless i "age" him up.... sona is the canine equivalent of a 18+ canine twink...that has to work out and gain experience to evolve... but refused to become he loves the attention he gets as a "pup"

    as for other sonas they look very different as they are hybrids but the similar deal, they are twinks (easiest explanation, since they are 18+ but have the "pup" body) i do have a couple that do not wish to evolve and keep their "base form" you know kinda liks ash's pikachu, so how would that work out?

    i mean considering that you know...it takes a "feral" being mature to you know engage in sexual acts you think it would be enough, but FA wants people to "age up" their characters?

    i mean i have no clue wth that means in the case of my sonas base form...or any of my other ocs.

    in the End it might just be easier to post art of fully evolved forms on FA , and 1st or 2st stages on IB... or just completely move to IB to avoid the headaches of having two platforms

    hell might even just start posting here to E6 and try to get the hang of the tagging system.

    having two websites just to check is a pain tbh

  • |
  • -1