avi, elon musk, and twitter bird (real world and etc) created by moko (artist)
Viewing sample resized to 80% of original (view original) Loading...
Show all comments
Blacklisted

    nwardho said:
    I wonder if people can sue elon musk, if his short "rampage" was actually destroying jobs and lifes of s.

    He can also get in trouble in other countries too because he fired union workers in Europe, as well as sold a lot of data that wasn’t sorted between region, which is illegal in basically every country that isn’t the US

  • |
  • 2
  • yuanh said:
    This just seems a bit too melodramatic, its a website

    Youtube is also "just a Website"
    Deviantart is also "just a Website"

    What is your point?
    Maybe grow up and realise that people actually have jobs that are linked to certain websites.
    Not to mention the parts "Nonstick" was already opening about.

    And it doesn't matter how many of those Elon Musk Fanboys downvote what is commented here, he's still an ***hole who exploited other people for his own benefit, stealing ideas etc.

    Sorry to break it down for you but he is a scam in human form.
    Everyone else doing what he has done would have already been imprisoned.
    Try the same shit as a small family business and you're facing at least 15 years of prison for financial crimes and deception

  • |
  • 8
  • nwardho said:
    Youtube is also "just a Website"
    Deviantart is also "just a Website"

    What is your point?
    Maybe grow up and realise that people actually have jobs that are linked to certain websites.
    Not to mention the parts "Nonstick" was already opening about.

    And it doesn't matter how many of those Elon Musk Fanboys downvote what is commented here, he's still an ***hole who exploited other people for his own benefit, stealing ideas etc.

    Sorry to break it down for you but he is a scam in human form.
    Everyone else doing what he has done would have already been imprisoned.
    Try the same shit as a small family business and you're facing at least 15 years of prison for financial crimes and deception

    I legit don't care what happens, twitter is trash if it gets better woo if it gets worse no skin off my back

  • |
  • 30
  • yuanh said:
    I legit don't care what happens, twitter is trash if it gets better woo if it gets worse no skin off my back

    I dont give any shit about Twitter.
    It could have been any other site aswell.

    What i'm going for was all about Elon Musk.

  • |
  • -9
  • pibblepunk said:
    Gotta love how many people will straight up just it they don't give a flying fuck about anything but themselves and think that makes them cool.

    If that's what you interpred (or want to assume) in it, then go for what ever makes you happy.
    But i really don't give a shit about twitter

  • |
  • -7
  • As a libertarian I sit kinda kid right. Twitter for a fact helped fencer freedom of speech and hid stuff for the us government. Those are facts. If u want Twitter to be a good place u need to go with facts.

  • |
  • -4
  • fluffy_inferno said:
    If twitter is less of the dumpster fire of the internet then it was worth it.

    Your current avatar is perfect for this comments section.

    Also, based.

  • |
  • 1
  • I can’t say twitter hasn’t always been a shithole, but Elon certainly isn’t helping to fix it much.
    Also if he or 9/10 of the top 1% truly gave a single flying shitfuck about you, me, or the average person he’d have spent a 10th of the 44,000,000,000 he used to buy twitter to feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, employ the jobless (by expanding his own companies even), or any other public work.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • yuanh said:
    This just seems a bit too melodramatic, its a website

    tbf artists use it for work, as do content creators and such, hard to find a furry artist that likes elon unironically

  • |
  • 9
  • orifan2 said:
    I can’t say twitter hasn’t always been a shithole, but Elon certainly isn’t helping to fix it much.
    Also if he or 9/10 of the top 1% truly gave a single flying shitfuck about you, me, or the average person he’d have spent a 10th of the 44,000,000,000 he used to buy twitter to feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, employ the jobless (by expanding his own companies even), or any other public work.

    Simply throwing money at those problems would not solve them as easy as you think.

  • |
  • 4
  • meryle said:
    Simply throwing money at those problems would not solve them as easy as you think.

    Explain to me why it wouldn’t. It’s all about finding people who’ll do what will need to be done reliably if you pay them. Wether it’s farmers, soldiers, or construction workers.

    Updated

  • |
  • -2
  • orifan2 said:
    I can’t say twitter hasn’t always been a shithole, but Elon certainly isn’t helping to fix it much.
    Also if he or 9/10 of the top 1% truly gave a single flying shitfuck about you, me, or the average person he’d have spent a 10th of the 44,000,000,000 he used to buy twitter to feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, employ the jobless (by expanding his own companies even), or any other public work.

    How much you give to the homeless individuals?

  • |
  • 0
  • orifan2 said:
    Explain to me why it wouldn’t. It’s all about finding people who’ll do what will need to be done reliably if you pay them. Wether it’s farmers, soldiers, or construction workers.

    This may be a late reply but throwing money at problems won't solve them if the systems and mechanisms that originated them aren't dealt with. If you want a more expansive answer, reply to me with a point by point list of what you could have doubts in so I can have a basis of what to answer and not go crazy with the multitude of both conceptual frameworks and historical facts necessary to compile to give a fully comprehensive one.

  • |
  • -1
  • To all the people in this comment section who said elon/twitter should be sued for acquiring the website and changing the tos, please think what you're saying logically and not emotionally. Twitter is a social media platform not a business platform, the fact that one can run a business from it does not make it so since it doesn't possess the same type of business contract a proper business platform would have and no, it's tos isn't a contract, is code of conduct to use the site. Twitter also isn't the only social media platform that exists, not does it possess a monopoly on social media platforming and not does it is the only way to conduct the kind of business an artist would use these kind of sites for. The site is also free to use, so no exchange of good for good or good for service is taking place, being the ad revenue given to s merely an incentive to continue using the site not a payment for expectation, much like a donation; s need to understand that they are not the customers of twitter, they are the product, the customers are the ment companies who do have a business contract with twitter. So, in summary, there's no contract, no monopoly, no expectation of any kind and by their own tos no reason for it not to change at any moment, but always in a way that heavily favors the company. What you're asking would be like trying to sue steam for being the #1, biggest market share, digital goods store; they are like that because they are the best, because the competitors are shit, not because the monopolize the market since, in theory, digital goods sale is unmonopolizable; they are upfront with their tos and everything that it entails, supposedly, and they are upfront with their expectation of commercial exchange, supposedly again; so, it's ultimately the fault of the purposely disinformed customer any and all form of conflict that arises between the parties; though I must say steam's case may not be a perfect analogy, so, as another example, suing them would be like suing a food company for advertising the existence of free samples of a product with a sauce in a mall but when to opportunity to acquire one arises the sauce has run out; there's no exchange of goods nor any expectation of such, the goods are given with freedom from attachment so the receiving party is not entitled to anything but not being poisoned by it. This whole debacle is ultimately caused by disinformation and/or unreasonable/unrealistic expectations from s and a lack of entrepreneuring s of a "diversified platform portfolio". In relation to the european case some pointed out, I must say I'm not sure, if he truly violated labor laws then there might be a case there.

  • |
  • 0
  • orifan2 said:
    I can’t say twitter hasn’t always been a shithole, but Elon certainly isn’t helping to fix it much.
    Also if he or 9/10 of the top 1% truly gave a single flying shitfuck about you, me, or the average person he’d have spent a 10th of the 44,000,000,000 he used to buy twitter to feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, employ the jobless (by expanding his own companies even), or any other public work.

    Most homelessness is caused by drug addiction and stubbornness, you can't give people jobs who are too lazy to get jobs, and world hunger can never be solved due to terrain or environment.

  • |
  • -4
  • pibblepunk said:
    Gotta love how many people will straight up just it they don't give a flying fuck about anything but themselves and think that makes them cool.

    Or that they won't care about the thing someone is doing, they'll only hate it if it a person they don't like.

  • |
  • 0
  • All Musk changed was that woko haram cannot censor you anymore. Free speach was restored. Zero impact to showing your pictures.

  • |
  • 1